From: GP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dari http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?articleid=RWT091001233055 http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT091001233055&PageNum=3 Dari perbandingan Cache memory: "As expected, the DDR twins kick the proverbial out of the SDRAM equipped KT7A. Not a 100% gain, but it is a significant difference. However, (isn't there always an exception?) your processor will, in most circumstances, spend 95%~98% of it's time accessing data in the Level1 or Level 2 cache, not main memory. So while you see big differences in the numbers generated here, this performance advantage most likely won't trickle over into huge real-life performance gains." Dari perbandingan SS Memory Bandwidth "Again, the DDR pair steal a lead over the SDRAM equipped KT7A. But not by as much as with the Cachemem scores. In fact, the apples-to-apples comparison between the tweaked KT7A and the tweaked KA266 and 8K7A+ does not show huge gain in scores. The Integer scores are also equal between the latency poor KA266 and the 8K7A+, suggesting that most of the scores are influenced more by cache than absolute main memory performance. Floating-point operations do show a preference for the EPoX and these are the instructions that aren't influenced as much by cache, so memory access (latency) times are of importance." -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else" -- Compu-Mania MailingList, provided by PT Centrin Online Tbk Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED], body: unsubscribe Compu-Mania Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED], body: help
