Robert Jasiek wrote: >executed solely by the programs versus executed by supervising >assistance (like the programmers, software, or referees, etc.)
Thats what I suggest: "executed by supervising assistance", perfect or not. I think its the only way. Expecting all the programs to agree is not very realistic. Don Dailey wrote: >So I see no point in moving towards Japanese rules for >computer/computer play. That's ok. Neither do I *for the moment*. There are lots of things to be done before. I just wanted to hear the opinion of the list about how it could be done. >Wouldn't it be much finer to focus our efforts on making >the program play better? Sure. I don't spend much time of this. Since the best part of our research area is that we can effectively verify our ideas by playing a game against someone else, having a reasonable interest in the ruleset is legitimate and, I'm sure, we all have. Jacques. _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
