I will think about that, but I know that the renormalization trick is
very sensitive. I find it hard to believe that any other test could be
any more sensitive. And I know the basis for the renormalization.
One question for both of you:
Are these the result of one random playout or are they from one
MC player playing against another (each using many playouts to
determine its move)?
Cheers,
David
On 22, Feb 2007, at 2:51 PM, Chris Fant wrote:
The difference is small, and only the renormalizations that would
show
any real differences.
Or you could create a chart that tracks board size and average chain
size and see if there is any association between the two. Do you
agree that that is also a sensible test, David?
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
