On 3/7/07, Harri Salakoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi As reading http://www.cs.unimaas.nl/~vanderwerf/pubdown/solving_go_on_sm
all_boards.pdf
don't understand chapter 5.1. Following 3*3 go game.
Maybe you were not actually reading the above link, but chapter 5 of my thesis? The thesis contains more info, so that's fine, but then it's better to use that as reference. All can be found at http://erikvanderwerf.tengen.nl/publications.html
-A2 eee bee eee
Don't like your formatting :-( ... #.. ...
-B2
... #O. ...
-B1
... #O. .#.
-C3 - can be bad move according chapter 5.1
Subtle details in the rules can occasionally make a huge difference. ..O #O. .#.
-B3? - don't understand how black wins using this move(a in diagram 10)
.#O #O. .#.
-A3
O.O #O. .#.
-C2
O.O #O# .#. !!! situation: white to move, no consecutive passes, no point illegal due to basic ko !!!
-A1
O.O .O# O#.
-B3
O#. .O# O#.
-C1
O#. .O# O.O
-A2
.#. #O# O.O
-C3
.#O #O. O.O
-B1
.#O #O. .#O
-A3
O.O #O. .#O
And now black has no legal moves as position repeats? at least my test code says so.
Move at C2 O.O #O# .#. situation: white to move, no consecutive passes, C1 Illegal due to basic ko
Somebody could enlight me what I have misunderstanded chapter 5.1.
The situation is different. For details see section 2.2.1 and appendix A of the thesis, or the section about the rules in the ICGA article. Erik
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
