>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: computer-go@computer-go.org >Sent: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 4:33 PM >Subject: Re: [computer-go] The dominance of search (Suzie v. GnuGo) >
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I also find this kind of information very interesting and useful. Now > I >> have a better feel for what kind of scaling is realistic to try >for > and >> how to measure it. >> > Putting some recent data points together, it look like giving Mogo 2 > >> > orders of magnitude more computer power would result >in low dan level > >> > 19x19 play? Not the sort of thing one can pull out of a back pocket, > but >> > tantalizing. >> > I would be very interested to see equivalent scaling numbers from > >> > CrazyStone, if Remi would be so kind. >> > - Dave Hillis >I don't have time to do this right now. I have connected Crazy Stone to play >10 minute blitz on KGS, and will leave it all night long. >It reached [1d] for >a while, and is currently [1k]. There is a big surprise effect when humans >play Crazy Stone. The first moves look >so stupid. Usually, a human player >will lose the first game, then it will win the next ones. > >Rémi _______________________________________________ Thanks, Remi. I was thinking that you might already have collected this information since testing against gnugo is so common. (My own program sucks at larger board sizes.) The blitz games sound interesting too. I'm sure I speak for all of us when I say that I'm looking forward to seeing your paper after the conference and I'd be interested in any hints you might have in the meantime. I promise to exploit any indiscretion to the best of my abilities. :) - Dave Hillis ________________________________________________________________________ Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
