New lesson learned. It depends on the rule set if something is correct or a
blunder.
So far the Go-masters told me, it does not matter, its practically the same.
Obviously its not. This is not some weired, constructed position, it really
happened and it does not look strange at all.
Chrilly
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik van der Werf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "computer-go" <computer-go@computer-go.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Interesting Test Position (for UCT)
On 7/11/07, chrilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attached is an interesting testposition which occured in UCT-Suzie
against
Peter-Woitke. If black plays 37 c4 the game is lost by 0.5 points. If
Black
passes, white gets a lot of threats. Black can choose between a safe
loss,
or some risk and a win.
UCT-Suzie and the public domain version of Crazy-Stone played the save
loss.
Seems like you're mixing up Territory and Area scoring. Under area
scoring rules the programs can strengthen their (final) position by
playing in their own territory. (Crazystone as Black would win under
Chinese rules)
The example illustrates why Japanese rules provide a slightly more
interesting endgame.
Erik
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
