Personally, I think that much of the "really high quality" issues are not
that important for MC Go right now. I think that other things like not
having a reasonable distribution function (which UCT does a remarkable
job of smoothing over) completely overwhelm the effects of a poor PRNG.

I agree with that.

By the way,
I have spent time on the use of improved forms of Monte-Carlo (quasi-random, stratification, ...) but I've never found an efficient trick.

OT
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to