In the original Mogo paper it's the initial value for the children, rather than try every child once.
> -----Original Message----- > From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go- > boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Petr Baudis > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:43 AM > To: computer-go > Subject: Re: [computer-go] rave and patterns > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:06:01PM -0700, David Fotland wrote: > > Depends on what you mean by basic UCT. I think I had no UCT priors > then, > > just a 1.1 or 1.2 K. The playouts included no self atari, no eye > filling, > > no retake ko, and some simple rules for saving group adjacent to last > move > > if it was in atari. I don't have time to dig up the old source so I'm > just > > going by my test notes. > > Ah, thanks for all the details! I'm sure they will be very useful for > all the future bot writers too, to know what to expect. Just last > question, > what is "1.1 or 1.2 K"? > > I'm personally getting around 30% success rate only with 50k playouts > (and RAVE makes no difference for me, still)... I guess I have some > grave bug to hunt. > > -- > Petr "Pasky" Baudis > A lot of people have my books on their bookshelves. > That's the problem, they need to read them. -- Don Knuth > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
