On 01.02.2016 07:30, Petri Pitkanen wrote:
Explaining why the move is good in human terms is useless goal. Good chess programs cannot do it nor it is meaningful. As the humans and computers have vastly different approach to selecting a move then by the definition have reasons for moves. As an example your second item 'long-term aji', For human an important short cut but computer a mere result for seeing far enough in the future or combining several features of postion into non-linear/linear computation.
Such is not "useless" but requires additional research or implementation. -- robert jasiek _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
