It was pointed out by Lee Sedol after the game and Kim Myungwan during the game, that Q5 should have been better at R4. I would say this was the final stage of the middle game. The result from the game left Lee Sedol with an unwinnable endgame. And "by resignation" is meaningless here. It is just a matter of personal preference if pros resign heir close games, even if their are lost by 0.5 or if they decide to resign. In this game most counts had AlphaGo 3-6 points ahead.
2016-03-09 8:49 GMT+01:00 Jim O'Flaherty <jim.oflaherty...@gmail.com>: > Congratulations, AlphaGo and team. And by resignation! That's fantastic! > > Anyone know where the tipping point was? Did Sedol get the end game order > just slightly off and AlphaGo took advantage? Or was their an earlier poor > move by Sedol and/or surprising (and good) move by AlphaGo? I'm WAY too weak > a player to even make stupid guesses. Any links to in depth analysis would > be greatly appreciated! > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:46 AM, René van de Veerdonk > <rene.vandeveerd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> wow .. congrats to the AlphaGo team!! >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Hiroshi Yamashita <y...@bd.mbn.or.jp> >> wrote: >>> >>> AlphaGo won 1st game against Lee Sedol! >>> >>> Hiroshi Yamashita >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Computer-go mailing list >>> Computer-go@computer-go.org >>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
