On 31-01-17 16:32, Roel van Engelen wrote: > @Brain Sheppard > Thanks that is a really useful explanation! > the way you state: "and therefore a 8192-sized pattern set will identify > all potential nakade." seems to indicate this is a known pattern set? > could i find some more information on it somewhere?
http://senseis.xmp.net/?BasicLivingEyeShapes -- GCP _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
