I don't understand which element makes you say that section 2 and 3 are all for a 20 block instance
Le 27/10/2017 à 01:49, Hideki Kato a écrit : > The 40 block version (2nd instance) first appeared in > Section 4 in the paper. Section 2 and 3 are all for the 1st > instance. > > Hideki > > Xavier Combelle: <39a79a0e-7c7d-2a01-a2ae-573cda8b1...@gmail.com>: >> Unless I mistake figure 3 shows the plot of supervised learning to >> reinforcement learning, not 20 bloc/40 block >> For searching mention of the 20 blocks I search for 20 in the whole >> paper and did not found any other mention >> than of the kifu thing. >> Le 26/10/2017 à 15:10, Gian-Carlo Pascutto a écrit : >>> On 26-10-17 10:55, Xavier Combelle wrote: >>>> It is just wild guesses based on reasonable arguments but without >>>> evidence. >>> David Silver said they used 40 layers for AlphaGo Master. That's more >>> evidence than there is for the opposite argument that you are trying to >>> make. The paper certainly doesn't talk about a "small" and a "big" >> Master. >>> You seem to be arguing from a bunch of misreadings and >>> misunderstandings. For example, Figure 3 in the paper shows the Elo plot >>> for the 20 block/40 layer version, and it compares to Alpha Go Lee, not >>> Alpha Go Master. The Alpha Go Master line would be above the flattening >>> part of the 20 block/40 layer AlphaGo Zero. I guess you missed this when >>> you say that they "only mention it to compare on kifu prediction"? >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
