Hi Hiroshi, Yes, Weights_33_400 was trained on 9x9. None of the Weights bot uses playouts. I experimented training different network architectures with the same self-play data, so that's why newer networks are not necessarily stronger than older ones.
Rémi ----- Mail original ----- De: "Hiroshi Yamashita" <y...@bd.mbn.or.jp> À: computer-go@computer-go.org Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Février 2018 23:24:02 Objet: Re: [Computer-go] Crazy Stone is back Hi Remi, Wow, "Weights" is your engine. So my guess was right :-) In 9x9 CGOS, did you train in 9x9, or just use 19x19 network? Weights_33_400 is stronger than Weights_40_400. Maybe it is because Weights_33_400 use CrazyStone's playout, and Weights_40_400 does not use? Thanks, Hiroshi Yamashita On 2018/02/28 15:13, Rémi Coulom wrote: > Hi, > > I have just connected the newest version of Crazy Stone to CGOS. It is based > on the AlphaZero approach. The "Weights" engine were in fact previous > experimental versions. CrazyStone-18.03 is using time control and pondering > instead of a fixed number of evaluations per move. So it should be much > stronger than Weights_31_3200. > > Does anybody know who cronus is? It is _extremely_ strong. Its rating is low > because it has had only weaker opponents, but it is undefeated so far, except > for one loss on time, and some losses against other versions of itself. It > has just won two games in a row against Crazy Stone. > > I hope the other strong engines will reconnect, too. > > Rémi > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
