On 4/29/07, Paul Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I don't think much of Christian Science - apologies in advance - but people generally don't doubt CSM's credibiility, and you can make the same argument about WSJ or the Economist on political lines).
This is an excellent point. Unfortunately, building credibility isn't at the top of all that many organization's list. Ben Stein is another person I find highly credible, though I often disagree with him. At least he makes me think that maybe I am missing some key points. I could go on and on. I may not agree with many people ideologically, but I definitely like to read the credible people on all sides. Same goes for computer writing - some people/magazines/organizations lose credibility by acting as shills, etc. -- John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
