It's pretty much for the film, but there might be the occasional print if I
don't have a neg or trans. The reviews on the B&H site are mixed.
david
David Turk
Manager, Preservation Imaging Services
Indiana Historical Society
Eugene and Marilyn Glick Indiana History Center
450 W. Ohio St.
Indianapolis, IN 46202
(317) 232-4592
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
B
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:50 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Microtek Artixscan M1
Unless you need a film scanner, I sure couldn't recommend you spend
$655 to scan paper. Especially not without an autofeeder. I know
nothing about film scanners, so if that's your question I can't help.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:27 PM, David Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Popular Photography had a glowing review on this scanner:
>
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/527608-REG/Microtek_110803680101_ArtixScan_M1_Pro_Dual.html
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************
