>It says it is "largely a big bug fix"? Really? Where? Where does it say >that? Where does it even *mention* bugs? Please be specific.
What do you think the reviewer is telling you by calling Win7 version 6.5? He does that in the FIRST SENTENCE! He calls it "Vista with the kinks worked out" in the SECOND PARAGRAPH! Is your entire argument based on his not using the word "bug?" One of my staff used to be a sports reporter. He once joked about spending all day writing that team "A" beat team "B", "C" beat team "D", "E" beat team "F", etc. The joke was finding different ways to say "beat" each time. The only difference for those writing about MS is finding different ways to say "bug." I am glad that "This Time Microsoft Gets It Right." The issue is how much we ought to be charged for a successor to Vista. Should be $0. (Apple did that with OS X.1. It was the honest thing to do.) ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
