Low level munchkin...oh I didn't mention, Phil Schiller himself rejected the app.
I'm sure it's not just silly cause it's apple under attack, couldn't be that. On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:06 PM, t.piwowar <t...@tjpa.com> wrote: > On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:37 PM, mike wrote: > >> The full version of what happened surrounding GV being rejected (so says >> google) or not rejected (so says apple) was finally released. Google >> released a redacted version of their side earlier but now the full version >> has been released and it says clearly that Apple rejected the app >> completely. Apple's reason of course was the same reason as they stated >> in >> the make believe world in which they said they didn't reject it but IF >> they >> were to this would be why...ridiculous reasoning to be sure. >> > > Even if some low-level munchkin rejected it for that reason it is entirely > possible that this reason was later rejected by higher management. I tell my > staff that this is the reason I have staff. > > What's the point of insisting that Apple rejected it? If Apple says they > are studying the issue how does it benefit anyone to insist that they stop > studying and issue a rejection. This whole argument is silly. > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
