I don't see em, they might have not gotten through if you got NO reply. I know we often go off track on the list, but I've rarely seen people ignored and I don't think it was ever done purposely.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Fred Holmes <f...@his.com> wrote: > At 01:47 AM 6/16/2010, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: > > Let's all try to be sarcastic as much as is possible, particularly > >when folks pose questions. Aren't questions supposed to be a primary > >reason for having the Computer Guy's List? If so, then why hand out > >s*** for doing exactly that? Do you wanna try to deep six the entire > >list, or just some of the folks on it? We already have too much > >sarcasm. Don't need more. > > > > Steve > > I think the answering of technical questions has gone by the wayside. A > couple of recent questions I've posted have not generated a single reply, > let alone an answer. > > Fred Holmes > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
