On 04/26/2012 05:58 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > I recently picked up one of these as they are relatively inexpensive (30 > USD) as compared to other Harmony remotes. > > Unfortunately, the prognosis for Concordance support does not look good: > a) the remote appears to use a protocol that isn't similar to any of the > protocols that Concordance currently supports > b) the remote appears to require use of a different website, > myharmony.com, as opposed to the usual members.harmonyremote.com. > Furthermore, myharmony.com seems to require the use of Microsoft > Silverlight and a Harmony web browser plugin.
Based on the files sent in by other Harmony 300 users, the protocol is at least somewhat similar.... or at least, consnoop is able to parse the files and make some sense out of them. But I haven't looked at those files that closely. The silverlite and browser plugin is a problem though. :( -- Phil Dibowitz p...@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
