On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > num_stages seems unnecessary, we already provide num_stages on the very first > callback by passing a stage_id of LC_CB_STAGE_NUM_STAGES. > > AFAIK, this is implemented in every entry point of libconcord. > > This patch hard-codes it a second time, and also doesn't take into account > things like no-reset which the existing code does. > > The only piece is that *which* stages there are. > > What if... hmm. > > What if we alter the API slightly to say that on LC_CB_STAGE_NUM_STAGES, 'arg' > is not an opague object, but instead a pointer to the list of stages?
Hmmm, that seems like it could be reasonable. Let me play with that a bit. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
