Hi, Another action item would be to: 1) do a pull request on github, 2) write down the workflow for committing the pull request to the UW repo, 3) see how the github UI behaves when the commit shows up.
Brian On Sep 25, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Tim St Clair <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe a good action item from yesterdays discussion would be to create a > account on github and give it a test drive for those who are not already on > it. > > It's very low cost. > > Cheers, > Tim > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Matthew Farrellee" <[email protected]> >> To: "Condor Developers" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 2:43:44 PM >> Subject: Re: [Condor-devel] github revisited. >> >> On 09/17/2012 05:08 PM, Matthew Farrellee wrote: >>> This is all good feedback. Please keep it coming. >>> >>> I'll summarize it and report back next week. >>> >>> If you want to reply off list, feel free to contact me directly. >> >> Here's an etherpad for the meeting today - http://sync.in/FzqZA01IVA >> >> Best, >> >> >> matt >> _______________________________________________ >> Condor-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Condor-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Condor-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-devel
