On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:06:03PM -0600, Patrick Mahoney wrote: > Not sure if this is a bug or intended behavior, but on Darwin > config.guess includes the output of `uname -r`, which seems to be > the major.minor.patch version of the darwin kernel.
It's not unusual, but there is no convention. It depends on the system type being guessed. > This test is too aggressive, since it means a program (execline) > cannot be compiled against a library (skalibs) that was itself built > on a different version of darwin, even though everything works just > fine after removing the test. See the discussion over at skalibs > mailing list: It would not be too difficult to match the output of config.guess against *:Darwin:*:* and, if matched, strip the unwanted version information using sed. If I remove the extra information, someone different will complain. ;-) Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ config-patches mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
