Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John J Foerch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> > To elaborate a bit on this, maybe we could define a set of standard >>> > keys like C-c C-n for next C-c C-p for prev, C-c C-i for index, C-c >>> > C-o for contents and so on. These could then be mapped to <link >>> > rel="next" content="URI"> if it exists OR provided by the page mode, >>> > such a mechanism would be useful for paging through albums (e.g. >>> > flickr) the next related video on youtube and so on. >>> >>> Those sound like logical bindings for link rel & friends. > >> What I mean is one of the non-intrusive things a minor mode could do >> that can be enabled by default is supplying a default link >> rel=next/prev/index/content when none exists. > > Yes, I agree completely with that. Note that currently there are a set > of regular expression to use to match anchor text if there are no rel > attributes, but a page made could fix things to make sure that the > correct thing is always matched, but fall back to the defaults if it > doesn't work or something.
To be perfectly clear about it, `link rel' should *always* be used when provided by the webpage. John _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
