Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A possible workaround would be to bind the relevant keys as pass > through keys in Conkeror, but this is obviously somewhat of a > nuisance.
At least if I look at my installed scripts in Greasemonkey, there are not that many that require key bindings - the mentioned LookItUp2 is one of the few exceptions, but I'd gladly do some configuring to get it to work. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trent W. Buck) writes: >> [...] for any given functionality implemented by a greasemonkey >> script, there is almost certainly a much cleaner and nicer way to >> implement it directly as a Conkeror module. > > While I don't dispute that, somebody has to then go to the work of > writing and maintaining that module -- and there are (presumably) > Conkeror users out there who can't (or don't want to) do that much yak > shaving. Yes, I'm afraid I'm one of those. ;-) There's really a lot of useful stuff on userscripts.org - bigger scripts like LookItUp2, which might justify their own Conkeror module, but also lots of smaller snippets where I'd love if they would "just work" without further fiddling. -David _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
