David Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Thoughts? > > I like it. > > Something I never liked in firefox was that you couldn't be sure > whether something typed would be interpreted as a url, a mozilla > keyword or something to pass to a search engine. And you couldn't > tell what keywords were defined. That doesn't arise in conkeror > because the completion system gives feedback on how the string will be > interpreted. So I think a default-webjump thing would work well. > > I'm happy to put some effort into the easy version; it seems > straightforward enough, if I can figure out the validation part. The > difficult version sounds very nice but it's beyond my current > knowledge and I won't be able to invest the time into it for a long > while. Perhaps that can be left as a longer term goal. > > regards, David.
Sounds good to me. I can see that modular completions are going to be a very involving feature to implement, if we end up doing it that way. -- John Foerch _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
