I haven't done any timed tests so my conclusions are based solely on
my subjective perception, however it seems that going back ("B") is
much slower in Conkeror than in Firefox. Conkeror appears to be
reloading the entire page instead of grabbing it from a cache the way
Firefox does. I use mobile broadband for my connectivity and the
difference in speed between the two browsers is very noticeable.
Of course, it's likely that I'm hallucinating. Is the page cache
something that's automatically handled by xulrunner or is the
implementation browser dependant?
Nicholas Ochiel,
I study theoretical mathematics. I write fiction. I like puppies.
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
