John J. Foerch writes: > > I'd set both to 1.0.0 and forget about this until there is a release > > 1.0 of Conkeror. Or interpret the rules creatively: nothing forbids > > negative integers, after all, so why not use 1.0.-1 for pre-release code? > > Will anything blow up if I set it to "1.0pre"? That is our version > number, so that is what users should see. I don't want users reporting > anything but our standard version number to me when they ask questions.
As long as they get the version number from Conkeror, it will be whatever Conkeror tells them. The version number from the bundle is only used by MacOS system administration tools. For example, if you selec "About this Mac" from the Apple menu and then click on "more info", you get the "System Profiler" which has, among others, a section entitled "Software". There you see the version numbers from the Info.plist. But even there, "1.0pre" is shown correctly, so even Apple doesn't seem to insist on their own numbering scheme. Which is rather good news. > It is astounding to me that Apple seems to think they can dictate their > One True version format to the world.. we use a very widely accepted > convention. That's nothing compared to what Apple dictates to iPhone users. Konrad. _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
