I'm looking for good discussions of the relationship between rights and remedies in constitutional law, in particular the extent to which remedies are or are not of the same status as constitutional rules.  I'm already aware of Sager's Legal Status of Underenforced Constitutional Norms, Barry Friedman's When Rights Encounter Reality, and Daryl Levinson's Rights Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

John T. Parry

Associate Professor of Law

University of Pittsburgh School of Law

3900 Forbes Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15260

412-648-7006

 

Reply via email to