I'm looking for good discussions of the relationship between rights and remedies in constitutional law, in particular the extent to which remedies are or are not of the same status as constitutional rules. I'm already aware of Sager's Legal Status of Underenforced Constitutional Norms, Barry Friedman's When Rights Encounter Reality, and Daryl Levinson's Rights Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration.
Thanks in advance.
John T. Parry Associate Professor of Law University of Pittsburgh School of Law 3900 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15260 412-648-7006
|
- Ninth circuit and the recall Parry, John
- Ninth circuit and the recall Howard Gillman
- Re: Ninth circuit and the recall Don Crowley
- Re: Ninth circuit and the recall Sanford Levinson
- Re: Ninth circuit and the recall Howard Gillman
- Re: Ninth circuit and the recall Sanford Levinson
- Re: Ninth circuit and the recall Richard D. Friedman
- Re: Ninth circuit and the recall Sanford Levinson
- Re: Ninth circuit and the recall Paul Finkelman
- Appeal Decision Marty Lederman
- Re: Appeal Decision Sanford Levinson