>From my days in family law (upon which I can look fondly because I'm not practicing in that area now), the case will probably turn on whether he gets joint legal, as opposed to merely physical custody.
-----Original Message----- From: Scarberry, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: And on another 9th Circuit note Thanks to Gregg for this information. The article notes that Newdow was granted joint custody, not sole custody, and suggests that his rights under the joint custody order--the terms of which are not yet set--may be more limited than would usually be the case. Mark S. Scarberry Pepperdine University School of Law -----Original Message----- From: Gregg Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: And on another 9th Circuit note I'm sorry, the I.T. department stopped me in mid-sentence. Here's the story: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1063212045712 -----Original Message----- From: Gregg Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: And on another 9th Circuit note This just popped into my mailbox. Michael Newdow regained custody of his daughter, perhaps boosting his chances of getting the POA "under God" case into the Gregg P. Miller Academic Support Tutor Thomas Jefferson School of Law 2121 San DIego Avenue San DIego, CA 92110 (619) 297-9700 ext. 1408
