Just an update about these two new potential connectors. I released a first initial version of the Alfresco Repository Connector in the branch CONNECTORS-278. This new connector is compatible with Alfresco 2.x, 3.x and 4.x, but probably it should be also compatible with Alfresco 1.x. I have to finish some new potential tests on the older version of Alfresco.
I would like to solve the following issues during the next week: - Maven tests executions: to build the specific Alfresco WAR I added a new Maven submodule created by the Maven Alfresco Archetype, and here I need to understand how to configure Maven to run this module before the tests module. - the integration tests implementation was tested on Alfresco 2.1.0, 3.4 and 4.0.b and this means that probably this connector should also work on Alfresco 1.x!!! :D - I have to add a new dependency to support the H2 database to run Alfresco during the execution of the integration tests created by Carlo Sciolla [1]. This is the unique way to run an Alfresco repository with an embedded database. But probably we need to ask to Carlo to add a specific license to allow us to use it in our Apache project. For the ElasticSearch Output Connector we have a potential contribution that could be made by one of my collegues that has started to think about an initial implementation of the connector, now we don't have the code, but it could arrive soon. I also started a discussion on the ElasticSearch forum [2] and two guys are interested to contribute and they would like to be involved in the development of this task: Michael Kelleher and Lukas Vicek!!!! I think that they could help us to consolidate not only this new connector but all the project. WDYT? Thank you for any feedback. Piergiorgio [1] https://github.com/skuro/alfresco-h2-support [2] https://groups.google.com/group/elasticsearch/msg/3f651ad3062ff172 2011/11/3 Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com>: > The Alfresco connector sounds like a "go" to me, as long as the > Alfresco folks support us. And it sounds like they are doing that. > > The ElasticSearch output connector I don't know enough about to have > an opinion on. Maybe I'll get lucky and run into somebody from > ElasticSearch at ApacheCon next week. As long as I don't give them my > flu germs, they might be willing to point us in the right direction. > ;-) > > Karl > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi > <piergior...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I would like to discuss with all of you about some new potential >> components that we could add to the project: >> >> 1. an Alfresco Repository Connector >> 2. an Alfresco Authority Connector >> 3. an ElasticSearch Output Connector >> >> Discussing with Karl in chat some days ago we talked about a new >> Alfresco Connector to cover all the older Alfresco installations that >> don't yet support the CMIS protocol. >> I think that it could be very useful to add an Alfresco specific >> Repository Connector to ManifoldCF, I'm sure that many users will >> appreciate it and the project could have a very wide range of >> connectors in this way. >> >> For the Alfresco Authority Connector I have some doubts because I >> don't find any way to follow, because we have the same limitation that >> has the CMIS protocol about taking ACL per user. >> By default you can take ACLs only for a specific content, this is a >> standard behaviour for many ECM products. >> >> But thanks to Karl that met Andy Hind at the Lucene EuroConference in >> Barcelona, now I'm in touch with Andy to understand if we find a way >> to implement an Alfresco Authority Connector using some undocumented >> APIs of Alfresco. >> >> For the ElasticSearch Output Connector I would like to have some help >> or anyway it could be nice to find someone that could write the >> connector or help me to achieve the goal. Maybe I found someone that >> can help me but I would like to have an official confirmation before >> starting to write the code. >> >> What do you think? >> >> I would like to have your feedbacks to start a good discussion to >> understand together how we could proceed. >> Thank you all for any feedback. >> >> Cheers, >> Piergiorgio >> >> -- >> Piergiorgio Lucidi >> http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi >> > -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
