Hi James,

so this is an open source mailing list and we don't do top posting here.
I know that Outlook is not your friend on this, but please accept the
rules here and make it work.

> Thanks for the comments Marcel.  I did use linux.intel.com as
> "-smtp-server linux.intel.com".  I'm not sure how that happened.

Check your .gitconfig.

> I don't think Open Plug's telephony server was designed with more than one
> SIM card per system in mind.  But I'll have to ask.

That is in principle pretty bad and limits it usefulness.

> Yes, this all compiled as of today at about 1pm.  So if it is mentioned
> that a function does not exist, then it still existed when I submitted it.
>  I do not just blindly submit a patch without at least making sure
> everything compiles one last time.

You can "git grep connman_settings" for yourself. That function doesn't
exists upstream. I have no idea in what kind of tree you are working,
but it is not an upstream function. If it were, there would be also a
file called src/settings.c in the tree. If you look closer into the
source, then you will see that we do namespacing that way.

+       char *profile = NULL;
+
+       if (connman_settings_get_current_profile_name(&profile) ==
+                                       SETTINGS_RETURN_SUCCESS) {

And trust me, that code doesn't even look like ConnMan coding
conventions when it comes to functions. We use proper -Exxx return
values and would not even bother with pointer of char pointer for just
getting a string.

Even without checking the source code, I could have told you that this
function doesn't exist.

Regards

Marcel


_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to