Hi Tomasz, > Should be better that way. :) > > What about my pacrunner patches? Are they interesting or should I wait for a > better design from you, about this method's specific executors split? > I have already ideas about execution and filtration over exclusion list for > manual method, but I guess it is better you clarify first the design. > (since there is this hashtable that might contain multiple config I guess you > want to handle that, and also I think - for instance - that executors should > be that signature: > __pacrunner_<method>_execute(struct pacrunner_proxy *proxy, const char *url, > const char *host) > and js specific should be out of client.c. Juste some thoughts.)
so you can not intermix patches with reply to emails. I leave it to you to discover why that is. So save this email as text and use "git am" on a local test tree and then have a look at the result with "git log" ;) Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
