Hi Daniel, On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:33:26PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > From: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> > > Hi, > > This is still very WIP. The first two patches should be okay (nothing > changed from the last post). The rest is getting slowly in shape. > > ConnMan will crash in connection.c because there is still too much > code depending on element. > > I have not yet decided how to remove the element code. Should I remove > it first and then add the new API? I try to add the new API without > touching the existing element code but as I progress the harder it > gets. > > Having one patch removing the element code and another adding > the new API might be cleaner to read. Though then only all patches > together form again working code base. > > Samuel what are your preferences? I would really prefer not breaking the code with any patch. Let's see if that doesn't make the patches to difficult to follow.
Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
