Hi Jukka, On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > thanks for the comments to v1 patchset. This second version > fixes the issues you found out: Thanks. > Patch #7: > - The IPv6 default gateway issue is still open, so far I have not > seen any problems with it (=not setting any routes in connman). > As you noticed the kernel automagically creates a default route > but that route is using link local address (at least in my test > system with 2.6.32 kernel). Also kernel creates routes to all > autoconfigured networks to specific interface. > I have a patch pending that clears the routes if user turns the > IPv6 off but I am not sure if that patch is really the correct way > to do it. I will send it to mailing list for comments after some > more testing. Anyway, this route problem should not affect this > patchset. As discussed on IRC, what I'm concerned about is about ConnMan setting the proper IPv6 default routes, and being able to handle multiple IPv6 connected services. We currently don't handle that, so we should be looking at it next.
Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
