Hi Henri, On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:05:09PM +0200, Henri Bragge wrote: > --- > > How about this? "eap-" not absolutely necessary prefix for types but I tried > to > avoid any confusion. > > PATCH v2: - dropped phase2 method, new fields types "eap-password" and > "eap-response" instead That would be a good compromise, yes. Let's go for that one.
Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
