Hi Samuel, ext Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Jukka, > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote: >> --- >> doc/service-api.txt | 11 +++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/doc/service-api.txt b/doc/service-api.txt index >> 9695059..da06898 100644 --- a/doc/service-api.txt >> +++ b/doc/service-api.txt >> @@ -332,6 +332,17 @@ Properties string State [readonly] >> >> The current configured IPv4 gateway. >> >> + boolean 6to4 [readonly] >> + >> + If set to true, the service will create 6to4 >> + tunnel if the service IPv4 address is not >> + private. Default value is false meaning that >> + 6to4 tunnel is not created. Only one tunnel >> + is created even if there are more than one >> + active service that have public IPv4 address. >> + Tunnel is created if it provides internet >> + connectivity. > So I'd like to simplify that and really leave it as a readonly > property.
So user would not be able to disable 6to4 then, is this really what we want to do? > The idea would be for ConnMan to enable 6to4 in one single case: IPv6 > is enabled, set to autoconfiguration, and didn't get a router > sollicitaion answer. Then we want to try to start 6to4. I'm not sure > how easy it would be to check if we got a route sollicitation answer > or not though... We can send solicitation message and catch the answer. I have some code from earlier project for doing this, that just need to get ported to connman. Jukka _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
