Hi, On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 17:53 +0100, lynxis wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:25 +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > Hi Henri, > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:05:09PM +0200, Henri Bragge wrote: > > > > --- > > > > > > > > How about this? "eap-" not absolutely necessary prefix for types > > > > but I tried to avoid any confusion. > > > > > > > > PATCH v2: - dropped phase2 method, new fields types > > > > "eap-password" and "eap-response" instead > > > That would be a good compromise, yes. Let's go for that one. > > > > Ok good. I'll start implementing this and the new service provisioning > > method. Might take few weeks because I'm quite busy right now. > > > hey henri, > > what's the status right now ? Do you need a little help ? Have enough > time and motivation to help implement it ;)
There are patches waiting for review and more comments at http://lists.connman.net/pipermail/connman/2011-March/004132.html Opinions on the API and implementation are highly appreciated. - Henri _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
