From: Patrik Flykt <patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
While investigating bug #23632, I noticed that Session API Destroy()
method call was not fully implemented, thus here's a patch to fix that.
I also updated test-session to use session.Destroy().
I don't think there is any use in sending a Release() back to the
application that destroyed it's session and I hope the removal of a
sentence in the documentation clears things up a bit.
Cheers,
Patrik
Patrik Flykt (3):
session: Implement Session API Destroy method call.
doc: Document that DestroySession will send Release to sessions
test: Use session.Destroy()
doc/manager-api.txt | 3 +--
src/session.c | 6 ++++++
test/test-session | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
1.7.2.5
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
