Hi Daniel, Le 11 nov. 2011 à 13:59, Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 11.11.2011 11:52, Patrik Flykt wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:30 +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: >>> There are cases where technology->pending_reply is set but the >>> corresponding technology->pending_timeout not. The technology enabled >>> was called from the Manager and the device was enabled right away. >> >> Patch looks good. Should we be extra suspicious and check the >> 'if (technology->pending_timeout > 0)' part outside of the >> 'if (technology->pending_reply != NULL)' block? Or am I being just too >> paranoid? > > Being paranoid sounds reasonable to me :) I'll apply the paranoid > version then. Hold on. As you said, you're fixing the symptoms, not the cause. We need to understand why we don't have a pending timeout while having a pending reply. Alok is looking at it. Cheers, Samuel. > cheers, > daniel > _______________________________________________ > connman mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
