On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 10:31 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> I am afraid, but the work for getting it routed to the right interface
> is not finished yet.
>
> So the initial plan was to go with SO_MARK set via a cgroup controller
> if you don't want to touch your application. For testing purpose you
> could either hack your application to set the SO_MARK option correctly
> or you hack one of the network cgroup controllers to allow setting the
> SO_MARK as well.
This applies if you have a group of processes that cannot be matched
otherwise. As long as one uses UID matching and all processes are run
with the same UID this should not be a problem?
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
