On 14 March 2013 12:39, flawer <[email protected]> wrote: > eis, any hints on parametering qualifications for a fsn (or qualifiable > platforms), will be welcomed. better, if posible you could suggest other > parameters from the ones i made already here: > > http://sharewiki.org/en/Free_**social_network<http://sharewiki.org/en/Free_social_network> > > related: but offtopic here: > http://sharewiki.org/en/**Ecoeco_platform<http://sharewiki.org/en/Ecoeco_platform> > > cos i want to do also the too big page of: > > http://sharewiki.org/en/**Ecoeco_free_social_network<http://sharewiki.org/en/Ecoeco_free_social_network> > > when more stable (now just have 2 edits), i could migrate it to the > libreplanet wiki.. >
I sort of like this ... to my mind a free social network is an extension of the concept of freedom of thought. One should be able to communicate uninhibited from constraint and also with the access policy under your own control Need to take those principles and codify them, but it's not always easy! > > ******** > > i see the fsn concept can also be splitted in at least 2 categories: one > for the lighttest featuring we want, and another for the qualifying of a > fsn for a socialer change organinzing (i.e. for a 'ambituous' fsn: i > haven't a good enough platform for substituting the quite issolated islands > of mailman and the riseup lists manager with the featuring of friends > circles per authenticated mail or IP, but that could be enoguh to be > considered a 'basic' fsn) (i.e. lorea goes in the second direction, > myprofile and others go in the first direction) > > i don't want to get on the task of qualififying or parametring different > apis or softwares, due to technical my lack of understanding properly some > bits and due to the fact that i consider the application's terms of use as > a important aspect of the fsn beyond software and apis. > >
