On Saturday, 6 June 2015 08:36:04 UTC+2, Francis Tyers wrote: > > Command: > > MAP (@subj @obj @nmod) TARGET (n) ; > > Current output: > > "<bear>" > "bear" n sg @nmod @subj @obj > "bear" vblex inf > "bear" vblex pres > > Desired output: > > "<bear>" > "bear" n sg @subj > "bear" n sg @obj > "bear" n sg @nmod >
>From CG's point of view, those forms are identical and must be treated identically. Internally, CG-3 stores readings in the latter split form, and only merges them on output. I can trivially add a flag to disable this merging, but just have the caveat in mind that the forms are logically identical according to the CG spec, and all tools should treat them identically anyway. -- TD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Constraint Grammar" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
