Hi,
I think I discovered a bug in the REMCOHORT command.
A minimal example:
---
# cat remcohort-bug.vrt | vislcg3 --grammar remcohort-bug.cg3 --trace >
remcohort-bug.dis
STRICT-TAGS += Noun Adj >AMOD ;
# this rule is triggered on "<2>", but not on "<4>".
WITH NOPARENT Adj
IF (-1 Noun) {
MAP >AMOD (*) ;
SETPARENT (*) TO (jC1 (*)) ;
REMCOHORT IGNORED WITHCHILD (*) (*) ;
} ;
---
Input:
---
"<1>"
"1" Noun
"<2>"
"2" Adj
"<3>"
"3" Noun
"<4>"
"4" Adj
---
Output:
---
"<1>"
"1" Noun #1->1
"<2>"
"2" Adj >AMOD #2->1 WITH:6 MAP:8 SETPARENT:9 REMCOHORT:10
"<3>"
"3" Noun #3->3
"<4>"
"4" Adj #4->4
---
As you can see, the rule is triggered on "<2>", but not on "<4>". When I remove
the REMCOHORT line, it triggers on both cohorts, but of course I do need
REMCOHORT.
Btw, an unrelated minor bug: NOPARENT does not seem to have an effect. I just
replace it by (NOT p (*)).
- Paul Meurer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Constraint Grammar" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/constraint-grammar/B3F0F4FD-A725-43B2-8BED-9F448EE9AC2D%40uib.no.
