On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:21:52PM -0600, Simon Cruanes wrote:
We could build on uutf, it's relatively small and doesn't have too many
deps. However, I also don't think utf8 is that complicated that we
couldn't just redo the codepoint<-> byte conversions in a simpler
Make it uutf compatible then, so one can either use uutf for full
functionality or use a few basic converters provided in Containers.
--
SP
_______________________________________________
Containers-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/containers-users
