Sounds great to me. But I'm confused. Are the api's passing around "keys" as in database keys (id), or so-called business keys, i.e. the project group's text id and the project's text id? I presume the latter, given the earlier discussions.
Christian. Jesse McConnell wrote: > I am thinking about pulling a short term branch of continuum with > rahul and working on getting everything converted to using a string > based key project and project group reference in all apis and in all > of the UI decision making items. He has tomorrow off so I think that > unless anyone has any big issues with it we'll try and make that > branch and work on it tomorrow. > > the end result of it would be: > > * int id's for project and project group in the model are for internal > store usage > * name's for project and project group are for presentation purposes only > * key's are for all api usage and passing around un URL's etc. > > some quick benefits are: > > * consistency across all apis and url manipulations > * ability to add quick url rewriting for direct linking of projects > foo.org/Doxia/Core > * common keys across running continuum instances for clustering > > jesse > -- *christian** gruber + process coach and architect* *Israfil Consulting Services Corporation* *email** [EMAIL PROTECTED] + bus 905.640.1119 + mob 416.998.6023*
