ok, I'll plow through the rest of the uncategorized issues now :)
jesse On 3/12/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to see the JBoss integration http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1167 added somewhere in the alpha process. On 3/12/07, Erik Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CLOB is supported by most of the databases, and Oracle is the only one > with > a particular API rather than plain JDBC > > Quoting Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Isn't Oracle the only database to offer a CLOB? > > > > I think writing it to a file in the build results directory like the > > other output makes perfect sense. Unless we are planning to search > > them, but then maybe lucene is a better choice anyway. > > > > Hmm, indexed and correlated build failures. I like that idea. Shiny. / > > me loses focus. > > > > - Brett > > > > On 12/03/2007, at 2:09 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: > > > > > Jesse McConnell wrote: > > >> sounds good to me, imo either trunc it or maybe switch the model over > > >> to a clob for that in the db... > > > > > > I tried to make it a CLOB once but couldn't get it to work because > > > of some JPOX issues IIRC so for alpha-1 just chop the exception and/ > > > or write it to a separate file and put the ideal solution into a > > > later alpha. > > > > > > Keep moving! > > > > > > -- > > > Trygve > > > > > >> jesse > > >> On 3/9/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> On 3/9/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > I have gone through jira issues there were assigned to 1.1 and > > >>> spread > > >>> > things out a bit. > > >>> > > > >>> > here is my criteria I used in separating out the issues: > > >>> > > > >>> > 1.1-alpha-1 -> issues that need to be addressed asap before we > > >>> pull > > >>> > any kinda alpha > > >>> > > >>> Not because I opened this but I think CONTINUUM-1194 should be > > >>> fixed. > > >>> I'll try to provide a patch this sunday for this. As a summary, > > >>> if an > > >>> error occurs and the stacktrace is higher than 8000 chars: > > >>> > > >>> * The build is stuck in Build In Progress > > >>> * No notification is triggered (an error has occured?!) > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Stéphane > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > 1.1-alpha-2 -> higher importance issues and ones generally > > >>> related to xml-rpc > > >>> > 1.1-alpha-# -> issues that probably ought to be resolved in the > > >>> alpha releases > > >>> > Future -> stuff that probably ain't going to get done any day soon > > >>> > > > >>> > the idea being that we can make new sequential release issues > > >>> off of > > >>> > the 1.1-alpha-# release tag until we are done with alpha > > >>> releases. I > > >>> > think once 1.1-alpha-1 is released then we can go through 1.1- > > >>> alpha-2 > > >>> > and decide what should be done, make a new release called 1.1- > > >>> alpha-3 > > >>> > and bulk move issues that aren't going to be addressed then (like > > >>> > maybe all the xml-rpc issues) > > >>> > > > >>> > I think we shouldn't worry about making these actually releases > > >>> cut > > >>> > with the maven-release-plugin. I say we just make a build and > > >>> get it > > >>> > available for download. Also tag the continuum trunk accordingly. > > > >>> > Then we ought to try to release a new alpha every few weeks > > >>> until we > > >>> > have the alpha-# issues converging towards 0. > > >>> > > > >>> > When we actually get to beta/rc releases then we can cut actual > > >>> releases. > > >>> > > > >>> > Now about my allocation of issues, its not gospel! If you > > >>> disagree > > >>> > with any of my assigning of fix versions then just fix it yourself > > > >>> > (the version, or better yet the bug). > > >>> > > > >>> > At the time of this writing I have the 1.1-alpha-1 release down > > >>> to a > > >>> > modest 8 issues with a few of those questionable and/or waiting > > >>> for a > > >>> > bit of feedback. I have yet to go through the 200 or so unfiled > > >>> > issues though so that might go up a bit, I'll do that now. > > >>> > > > >>> > thoughts? > > >>> > jesse > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On 3/7/07, Emmanuel Venisse < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > We don't need it the migration tool now. We'll can see to it > > >>> when we'll release a first beta on rc. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Emmanuel > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Brett Porter a écrit : > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On 07/03/2007, at 9:52 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> Ok, well the little poll thread I made seemed to be > > >>> strongly in favor > > >>> > > >> of getting things pulled together to start getting alpha > > >>> releases out > > >>> > > >> of continuum. So with that in mind here is a list of a > > >>> few things > > >>> > > >> that we need to get in order for an alpha release that I > > >>> shamelessly > > >>> > > >> started base on bretts comments > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> - properly mark up the model as it was for 1.0.3 release > > >>> > > >> - add methods to continuum-data-management to utilise that > > >>> and then > > >>> > > >> make any necessary transformations (c-d-m will do the > > >>> basic 1-to-1 > > >>> > > >> conversions) > > >>> > > >> - probably write a little CLI to fire it off. > > >>> > > >> - vet jira for a 1.1 alpha 1 release version and maybe > > >>> schedule out a > > >>> > > >> couple of alpha-# releases. > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> I think I'll start in on the data management bit now since > > >>> that seems > > >>> > > >> like the biggest hurdle. I am not convinced we really > > >>> need to worry > > >>> > > >> about a continuum 1.0.3 -> continuum 1.1 migration > > >>> ability...its not a > > >>> > > >> difficult thing to get projects loaded back up into > > >>> continuum...but > > >>> > > >> we'll see I guess. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > It is a pain, but having said that we could potentially add > > >>> it in a > > >>> > > > later milestone. I wouldn't want a final version without it. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> anyone have anything to add? > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> jesse > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> --jesse mcconnell > > >>> > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > -- > > >>> > jesse mcconnell > > >>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
-- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
