On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 29/02/2008, at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > > why 1.1.x? > > in case there was a bugfix release on 1.1? I thought that was what the > branch was for... maintenance of 1.1. > > or is there going to be 2 completely different strands of development? I thought to do 1.x in the branch instead of only maintenance in 1.1.xbecause I don't know how many time we'll need for the first 2.0 release. User will probably need some new small feature before the 2.0release and not only maintenance. > > > - Brett > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on > >> a branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, > >> and > >> none merged to the other. > >> > >> Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to > >> 1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and > >> use that for bugfixes only? > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> - Brett > >> > >> -- > >> Brett Porter > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >> > >> > > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >
