Ah, you have one cvs modules by project module.
It's really strange to use this structure in CVS, generally a CVS module is used for a complete project with some subdirectories for project modules.

In your case, you can't use a parent pom without some work. I have 2 work 
around:
- Refactor your CVS structure to a more standard
- Keep your actual structure and create a new module that will contains a parent pom and a list of symbolic link to your actual CVS modules. An other user use this solution and it's works fine.

Emmanuel

Sanjay Choudhary a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,

We use CVS (I wish it was svn). Each project of application corresponds to a
module in CVS.

at root level pom.xml (Not in cvs)  failed as it doesn't exist in CVS.  I
copied it manually to folder 1. In working directory I was able to see
pom.xml

parentPOM ( in cvs)  in continuum folder name 2

common (in cvs)  in continuum folder name 3

ejb1 (in cvs)   folder name 4

ejb2 (in cvs)  folder name 5

war (in cvs)  folder name 6

Java (in cvs) folder name 7

ear (in cvs) folder name 8

All the projects in CVS has pom.xml

Now when I run mvn compile (or anyother phase) it doesn't work. It looks for
the directory common , java, war etc. which are not present. (Which I
expected)

( I don't know the design reason, but it would have been great if we had
real folder names instead of numeric numbers.)

Let me know if I am doing something wrong here!!

-Sanjay


On 2/26/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

ok you don't use the standard maven layout.

If you want to build all in one time, you should add a new pom in the root
directory of your parent
pom and add one module in it (the parent pom), so all your modules will be
checkout in the correct
directory structure

Emmanuel

Sanjay Choudhary a écrit :

Hi Emmanuel

I like option 2 and I tried it too but it doesn't work

My Parent pom has module definition as below:

<modules>
   <modules>
     <module>../common</module>
     <module>../ejb1</module>
     <module>../ejb2</module>
     <module>../war1</module>
     <module>../java1</module>
     <module>../ear</module>
  </modules>
</modules>

But since Continuum uses number instead of folder name -N option doesn't
work.  Is there a work around to this issue?

-Sanjay

On 2/25/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Actually a build start only if you have some changes in scm for your
project. In future, we'll can
start a build if a dependecies is new.

If you want the latest EAR, without changes in your EAR project, you

must

build it manually from
Continuum. or you can build all from parent project if you remove -N
parameter in the build definition

Emmanuel

Sanjay Choudhary a écrit :


Hi All,

We hv. and application building thru continuum

Our application is a normal J2EE application

pom.xml

EAR Project

EJB1 Project

EJB2 Project

Jar Project

Jar Project

War Project

Each of them has pom.xml.  Now if we have change in Jar Project and

EJB1

project, continuum builds the projects fine but doesn't rebuild the

EAR.

Now we don't have a latest EAR and deploy.  Is there a workaround to

this?


Or this is a normal behavior of Continuum.

If it is the normal behavior, then how we we get the latest EAR?

Thanks,
Sanjay






Reply via email to