In show projects page: Single click on build now results in 2 enqueued builds. Single click on build-all results in 1 enqueued build (with only one project added of course).
Forgot to mention in using Firefox/1.5.0.4 Adam -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 1:59 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: building twice - version 1.0.3 the sql warning isn't important. I can't reproduce it. It's probably a silly question, but do you click on 'build Now' or double click it? Emmanuel Adam Leggett a écrit : > This is my log output. > > INFO | jvm 1 | 2006/06/23 13:34:32 | 2006-06-23 13:34:32,382 > [SocketListener0-1] INFO Continuum - Enqueuing > 'hello-world Application' (Build definition id=1). > INFO | jvm 1 | 2006/06/23 13:34:32 | 2006-06-23 13:34:32,913 [Thread-2] > WARN SQL - Object with id "0" not found ! > INFO | jvm 1 | 2006/06/23 13:34:32 | 2006-06-23 13:34:32,973 > [SocketListener0-1] INFO Continuum - Enqueuing > 'hello-world Application' (Build definition id=1). > INFO | jvm 1 | 2006/06/23 13:34:33 | 2006-06-23 13:34:33,043 [Thread-2] > INFO ContinuumScm - Updating project: id: '1', name > 'hello-world Application'. > INFO | jvm 1 | 2006/06/23 13:34:33 | 2006-06-23 13:34:33,113 [Thread-2] > INFO ScmManager - Executing: svn --non-interactive update > > Does the SQL Warning have any significance? > > TIA > > Adam > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 1:09 PM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: RE: building twice - version 1.0.3 > > > Emmanuel > > I also seem to be getting this problem. I have a single build > definition. Selecting 'build now' results in two builds of the same m2 > project. > > Env: > Cn 1.0.3 > XP pro > Jdk 1.5 > > Thanks > > Adam > > -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:33 AM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: building twice - version 1.0.3 > > > Do you have 2 build definitions on your project? > > Emmanuel > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : >> Hi all, >> Thanks for the responses. I actually avoid using "refresh" to >> keep this from happening - I instead, as you mentioned, click the >> Show Proejcts link to get an update on the status. However, this >> isn't my problem. >> >> Even from a freshly setup continuum project, if I click on the "Build >> Now" icon, continuum builds 2 builds, one after the other. For this >> example, I'm simply running "java:compile" (I'm using M1.1-beta2), and in >> the first build, it prepares the filesystem, and compiles the files (takes >> in total 10 seconds). The second build right after that only takes 2 >> seconds to complete, since no changes have taken place, so it essentially >> does nothing. >> >> >> Looking at the console output for Continuum, there seems to be 2 >> "enqueings" of the project from the moment I hit the build now >> button. I do nothing from the time I press the button until the >> console stops generating output. >> >> Any thoughts for this? >> >> Thanks, >> Josh >> >> >> >> -----Original Message------- >> Yes, actually, if you refresh a page generated just after a form, the >> form is resended when you refresh the page. You can click on Show >> Project link in menu instead. >> >> We'll fix this problem in 1.1 >> >> Emmanuel >> >> Rick Riemer a �crit : >> >>> Joshua, >>> >>> I've seen the same thing recently. In my case what happened is that >>> I refreshed the status page to see if the build was actually >>> started, but with doing that I was giving another command to start a >>> build. >>> >>> Once I stopped refreshing no more builds happened. >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Joshua Steele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:35 >>> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org >>> Subject: building twice - version 1.0.3 >>> >>> All, >>> I'm having an issue with Continuum 1.0.3 where it is building a >>> project twice, one immediately after the other. I've scanned JIRA >>> and can't find a report. Is this something that is known? Any >>> details are appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Josh >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > ====================================================================== > ===== > The contents of this email are intended for the named addresses and may > contain confidential and/or privileged material. If received in error, > please contact UPCO head office on +44(0)113 201 0600 and then delete > the entire mail from your system. Unauthorised review, distribution, > disclosure or other use of information could constitute a breach of > confidence. Your co-operation in this matter is greatly appreciated. > > Every effort has been taken to ensure that this email and any > attachments are virus-free. However, UPCO does not make any warranty > to this effect, and is not liable for any damage done by an infected > email message or attachment. UPCO recommends that all emails and > attachments are checked before opening. > > All views or opinions expressed in this electronic message and its > attachements are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect > the views and opinions of The Ultimate People Company Ltd. > =========================================================================== > > > > >
