Emmanuel, thanks for this clarification.
I see one last possible issue though: I need to run the "first" build before the "second" one, obviously. So, I guess I can schedule them so that the second one is run a few minutes after the first one. However, this implies that any change performed in this time span will trigger the second build before the first one... Is that correct ? Or maybe, I can give then the same schedule ? But in this case, how is the ordering decided ? Does the GROUP build has precedence ? Is the order the same as displayed on the web page ? -- Julien On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:08:53AM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > In 1.1-alpha-2, build definition are independant and even if we don't have > changes since latest update, the build will run if you have changes since > latest execution of the current build definition. > > Emmanuel > > Julien Stern a écrit : > >On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:11:59PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > > >>You should run them in separate build definitions. > > > >But if I do that, the second one will never run because nothing > >will have changed, no ? > >And If I do a fresh build, I will loose the output from the > >first run... > > > >-- > >Julien > > > >>Emmanuel > >> > >>Julien Stern a écrit : > >>>Hi list, > >>> > >>>I would like to run several Maven2 goals for one project under > >>>Continuum. > >>> > >>>The problem is that some of these goals should be run in --non-recursive > >>>mode, while some others should be run as a reactor. > >>> > >>>One example would be to generate the dependency-convergence for > >>>a lot of modules and then deploy the site but only for the top-level > >>>modules (it takes days otherwise and continuum runs out of memory > >>>anyway). > >>> > >>>So, what I would need is to be able to run, for instance > >>> > >>> mvn project-info-reports:dependency-convergence > >>> > >>>and then > >>> > >>> mvn --non-recursive site:deploy > >>> > >>>But of course, these should be run from the same place and the second > >>>command should be triggered even if the first one succeeds :) > >>> > >>>Is there any way to do this in the 1.1-alpha-2 version of continuum? > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Julien > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > >
